<< April 17, 2008 >>
a proportional response
yesterday's posts seem to have resonated quite strongly with my readership. i received both an email and an instant message about them, and from different people no less. this is unprecedented.
first, i'd like to issue a clarification on one matter. it comes to my attention that perhaps not everyone might see the absurdity in mitt romney being someone's friend, let alone someone that i may even know. with that in mind, i offer you the following two interpretations; feel free to come up with your own as well:
- by "friend," i may have meant mortal enemy
- by "robert," i may have meant someone other than robert love. for the sake of this exercise, this person may be considered imaginary.
i am trying to move on with my life from bush's comments yesterday, as otherwise i'll get nothing done today due to stress and freaking out, but wanted to point out that i don't see secularism and relativism, as i understand them, as leading directly to hedonism; i like to think that they recognize that there are slippery slopes on both sides of a hill.
instead, i leave you with the following headline from cnn:
CNNMoney: U.S. currency sinks to new low
the article goes on to cite a youtube video that surfaced over the weekend, showing the Dollar at a party, quite inebriated, making out with some girl of, if the comments are to be believed, considerably ill repute:
